As you can tell, I am trying to drink down our cellar, and get rid of a lot of cheaper wines we have bought on impulse. This is one of those wines that falls into this category, but really, at $6.99, this isn't a bad buy in the least.
Both the nose and the palate really reminded me of a $10-15 Bordeaux for some reason, which is not a bad thing considering what this wine actually cost. Not a lot on the nose other than a ton of alcohol, a bit of red fruit, a lot of oak, and the smallest hint of brett. Some slight hints of pencil led, slate, and currants are what really reminded me of a cheap Bordeaux. Call me crazy, but if tasting this blind, I would have guessed it were a cheap Bordeaux, or maybe even a Chateanuef from the nose alone. Some minor strawberry nuances showed on the nose as well, but I think the alcohol dominated everything else, but maybe it just needed more time. Being non-vintage, I guess we may never know.
It was a bit strange though, and didn’t remind me of an Italian wine in the least. Maybe the other bottles will show differently if we ever decide to give it a whirl again. I am sure there is some bottle variation here as this is a mass produced wine.
On the palate, nothing really shines though, but this is a decent table wine after a few hours in the glass for the alcohol to blow off. Not a bad quaffer for the money, and like I said, a decent table wine. Blows $2 Chuck out of the water any day of the week, and would be a perfect table wine for guests with pizza. Cheers
The Miracle of Montalcino ~ A Master Class from a Young Master – Pt.II
-
In the last week or so, I've been mulling over why Brunello latched onto
the American wine imagination as easily and rapidly as it did. The fine
wine wor...
10 hours ago

No comments:
Post a Comment